Title: |
'Outcomes in Children who are Deaf-Blind with Cochlear Implants' |
Track: |
3-Early Intervention and Beyond
|
Audience: |
Primary Audience:
Secondary Audience:
Tertiary Audeince:
|
Keyword(s): |
deaf-blind, cochlear implant, communication |
Learning Objectives: |
The learner will describe the variability in outcomes in children who are deaf-blind with cochlear implants
|
Abstract: |
Rationale: Deaf-blind children are receiving cochlear implants, however little is known about outcomes in this complex group of children.
Objective: To describe receptive and expressive language skills in children with dual sensory impairments with implants.
Methods: A multi-site study prospectively enrolled deaf-blind children 6 months to 8 years pre-cochlear implantation. Children completed evaluations pre-implant and at 6 months intervals post-implant. Communication skills were evaluated using the Reynell-Zinkin, a developmental assessment for children with dual sensory impairments.
Results: 75 children, 6 months to 5 years were enrolled from 22 states. The range of age of cochlear implantation was 7 months to 5 years, 2 months. 85% of children were implanted <3 years of age. Primary etiologies were CHARGE (29%), prematurity (19%), and congenital CMV (11%). 65% of children had physical challenges, 40% with cognitive challenges, 16% with behavior challenges, and 55% with complex health needs. 46% of children have had their implant for over 4 years. 51 children completed the Reynell-Zinkin with > two time points (pre- implant, 6 months post-implant). 36% of children developed some response to sound, 34% respond to simple words and short phrases, 16% could identify some words, 10% could follow simple directions, and 4% could understand complex directions with spatial and size concepts. For expressive language, 63% developed some sound production, 18% developed one word or expressive jargon, 7% developed some meaningful words, 6% developed simple sentences, and 6% developed complex sentences.
Conclusions: Many children with dual sensory impairment with implants remain with pre-linguistic communication skills post-implant.
|
Handouts: |
Handout is not Available
|
|